Springfield has taken the next step by giving the EMP the Ronin treatment. Photo credit: Springfield Armory


The Springfield EMP was first introduced in 2006. The Enhanced Micro Pistol, EMP, represented a new category of semi-auto pistols. While it did not look significantly different than a standard 1911, it was a completely new design. The EMP was designed around a smaller frame specifically for the 9mm cartridge. This required a completely new set of specifications for the frame, slide, barrel, extractor, firing pin, and other parts. The result was one of the slickest little 9s on the market. Even today, some 17 years later, it continues to be one of Springfield’s best sellers.

The EMP was initially offered in a 3” barrel, compact model, and 4.25”, “Commander” size, model. The EMP was a feature-rich pistol with an ambidextrous safety, match-grade hammer-forged barrel, and excellent sights. When I first shot the EMP, I was impressed with the fit, finish, and overall quality of the pistol. The one negative was that the MSRP, on the EMPs, was north of $1000.00.

Enter the Ronin

In 2020, Springfield launched the Ronin series of pistols. The purpose of the Ronin was to offer pistols that were feature-rich, and value-priced. Each Ronin model was built to the same exacting standards as other models. This included using forged frames and slides, hammer-forged barrels, and quality internal parts. The Ronin also featured a beautiful hot salt blued slide, with polished flats, that is normally found on more expensive firearms. Some changes help reduce the price, including a single side thumb safety and only one factory magazine. Until now, Ronin models were reserved for pistols based on the .45 ACP frame. These included a 5” Government model and 4.25” Light Weight model, offered in .45 ACP and 9mm.

Recently, as part of a revised product line, Springfield announced that the Ronin series would now include the EMP 3” and 4” models. The Ronin EMP replaces the legacy EMP models. Shortly after the introduction, Springfield sent me one of each model, for this review.


The Ronin EMP 4” is a great pistol for daily carry. It features a full size, alloy frame, and a 4” barrel. Photo Credit: Springfield Armory


The Ronin EMP 3” is ideal for those who need a smaller pistol for concealed carry. The compact frame and 3” barrel reduces the overall size. Photo Credit: Springfield Armory

Enhanced Features

Both EMP pistols feature an alloy frame with a clean satin finish. The edges are nicely contoured, with few sharp edges. An extended thumb safety and beavertail grip safety are standard on all Ronin models. The skeletonized trigger features a serrated face while the magazine well is nicely beveled. One feature, I appreciated, is the bevel on the bottom of the mainspring housing. The stocks are thin profile with half checkering and the Springfield crossed cannon logo.


The operating features of the Ronin EMP include an extended safety, a beavertail grip safety, and high profile sights.


The stocks, on both models, are thin profile wood with half checkering and the Springfield logo.

The slide is machined from carbon steel and features a matte finish on the top with polished flats. The rear sight is a “tactical rack” design with white dots while the front sight features a red fiber optic insert. The EMP barrels are a bull design that are match grade with a fully supported ramp.


The rear sight is a tactical rack design that facilitates one hand manipulation.


The face of the rear sight is serrated and has dual white dots.


The front sight is dovetailed into the slide and has a red fiber optic.

Model Details: Compact vs. Full Size

The 3” model is based on the compact frame and comes with one 9-round magazine that has an extended butt plate. This model has an overall length of 6.6” and weighs 24 ounces. The 3” model also has a dual captive recoil spring with a full-length guide rod. The trigger on the compact model had a very clean break that averaged 4 lbs. 12 oz.


Both the guns have a bull, bushingless, match grade barrel.


The 9mm EMPs feature a fully supported feed ramp.

The 4” model has a full size frame and comes with a single 10-round magazine with the standard polymer extended butt plate. It has an overall length of 7.6” and weighs 27.5 ounces. Unlike the compact model, the 4” model features a flat wire recoil spring with a full length guide rod. The trigger on the 4” model was as crisp as the 3” model and averaged 4 lbs. 11 oz.


The 4” pistol is shown field stripped. Note the paperclip inserted into the guide rod.


The compact 3” pistol is shown field stripped for cleaning.

Field stripping on the pistols is somewhat different due to the recoil spring designs. For both pistols, the first step is to pull the slide back, align the disassembly notch, and remove the slide stop. On the 4” gun, the recoil spring is compressed and a paperclip is inserted into a hole in the recoil spring guide. With the spring compressed, the entire assembly can be removed. On the 3” model, the recoil spring is compressed and a takedown spacer is clipped on the recoil spring guide. This allows the shorter recoil system to be removed.


This is the spacer that is used to disassemble the 3” compact pistol.


The spacer is shown clipped onto the recoil spring guide prior to disassembly.


Both the 3” and 4” gun ran perfectly during range trips.


The 3” gun was very flat shooting and produced some outstanding groups.

The guns ran very well and, at 25 yards from a bench, both produced groups that were 3”, or better when I did my part. The best group with the 4” model was shot with Federal HST and measured 1.75”. With the compact gun, the same load produced a 1.5” group.

Shooting plates from 15 yards, both guns tracked well. The fiber optic made following the front sight, during recoil, very easy. While the compact model has a shorter grip, it was long enough to allow a full grip with all four fingers of the support hand.


There were a couple of things that, given the chance, I would change on the pistols. The first, and most critical, change I would make would be the stocks. The thin stocks, combined with the thinner EMP frame, just did not fill my hand well. In addition, I found that I did not always disengage the grip safety. It was noted that one of the other shooters had smaller hands and did not have this issue. When I got home, I pulled the thin stocks and installed a pair of standard stocks on the 4” pistol. This seemed to solve the problem.


The thin stocks are well designed but the author prefers standard stocks.

Second, I wish Springfield would contour the edges on the thumb safety. This was not a huge issue but radiused edges would be an improvement. Finally, it would be nice if they offered a flush-fit magazine for the compact model. This would mean a reduction of one round but would be a nice addition. Other than those two issues, everything else was positive.

Final Thoughts

As with other projects, I wish that time, and ammo allotments had allowed more range time. Unfortunately, while things are getting better, the days of running multi-thousand-round torture tests are over.

For additional information, visit Springfield Armory



1911 Ronin EMP 4” (PX9123L)

  • Caliber          9mm
  • Finish            Blued Slide/Satin Aluminum Frame
  • Barrel            Match Grade 4” Ramped 1:16
  • Rear Sight    Tactical Rack White Dot
  • Front Sight  Red Fiber Optic
  • Recoil System            Flat wire/Full Length Guide Rod
  • Stocks           Thin Wood Half Checkered
  • Weight         27.5 oz.
  • Length          7.6”
  • Height           5.1”
  • MSPR            $899


1911 Ronin EMP 3” (PX9124L)

  • Caliber          9mm
  • Finish            Blued Slide/Satin Aluminum Frame
  • Barrel            Match Grade 3” Ramped 1:16
  • Rear Sight    Tactical Rack White Dot
  • Front Sight  Red Fiber Optic
  • Recoil System            Flat wire/Full Length Guide Rod
  • Stocks           Thin Wood Half Checkered
  • Weight         24 oz.
  • Length          6.6”
  • Height           4.8”
  • MSPR            $899


Source: GunsAmerica Digest